Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Yesterday

WP:AFD/Y

Purge page cache if page isn't updating.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< March 24	March 26 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Seneca, Arizona

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This one is a mess not in the least because it's not clear that the ghosttowns.com entry is talking about the same place, but according to this story the place came into being as a failed attempt by the local reservation to create a vacation spot. I'm not sure that it all there is to it, as it shows up on the map before that timeframe, but at any rate it is absolutely not a populated place now. Mangoe (talk) 02:43, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Seneca Lake Recreation Complex with the artificial Seneca Lake on Cienega Creek that flows down Mule Hoof Canyon is indeed where this is. But it is not Cienega Creek; this one rather being a minor tributary of the Salt River. The construction of the complex on the San Carlos Apache Indian Reservation in the 1970s required the production of OCLC 21683618 before it could be signed off.
The ghosttowns page implies that Seneca "ghost town" was part of the asbestos mining in Arizona; and hdl:10150/629706 confirms the existence of a tiny Seneca Mining Company in the 1950s, although other Bureau of Mines publications such as OCLC 1990345 indicate that Accident Group of Globe was the major asbestos mining company there.
In the 1980s GNIS, Seneca at 33°45′24″N 110°30′44″W / 33.75667°N 110.51222°W / 33.75667; -110.51222 (Seneca) was a "locale" not a "ppl". So this is another "unincorporated community" lie that is not really fixable as it isn't the real subject anywhere. asbestos mining in Arizona is a missing subject, but this would be a totally ridiculous way to start it.
Uncle G (talk) 04:07, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Murugummi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smart boy Ke (talk • contribs) 19:00, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 March 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:13, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Andhra Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:38, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural keep. No valid reason for deletion has been given. If someone makes a real nomination, I'm neutral. Google Maps has something called Murugammi మురుగమ్మి , i.e. under a different spelling, albeit it's unclear whether the area is populated. Geschichte (talk) 08:09, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Epps

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject appears to be a routine academic without any indication of meeting WP:PROF or WP:GNG. There is no significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable secondary sources. Significant coverage is not understood to include mere mentions in media. Receiving an honorable mention for a junior scholar's award does not constitute a major academic prize. This article seems to exist solely for self-promotional purposes. Notability requires more than merely holding a faculty position at a law school. Without independent recognition, awards, or influence beyond their institution, routine faculty members do not merit standalone articles per longstanding consensus. LogicSoup (talk) 15:43, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 March 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - although tenured, he's not a named chair, nor does he have a distinguished citation record. Please ping me if you're aware of any other way he can pass the PROF test. Bearian (talk) 02:22, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Law, Massachusetts, Missouri, and North Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:39, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lance Kramer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced biography from 2006. Could not find SIGCOV about him. Natg 19 (talk) 23:02, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and Comics and animation. Natg 19 (talk) 23:02, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 23:02, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Some coverage for someone with a similar name [1], I don't know if it's this person though. Oaktree b (talk) 23:58, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think it is the same person. IMDB (not RS, I know) has several Lance Kramers: [2][3] Natg 19 (talk) 01:37, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't follow WP:GNG and the lack of sources seems like grounds for deletion. Cottagechez (talk) 00:03, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, California, and North Dakota. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:40, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SiGMA Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a promotional article about a non-notable affiliate marketing company. Most of the references are press releases from the company. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:58, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:58, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – I live in Canada so my search results are skewed towards Canadian companies, but there are at least three other Sigma Groups in just Canada, and like this article's topic, none of them have reliable, in-depth coverage. I.e. this company might not even be the primary topic, as all the companies are equally unnoteworthy. Yue🌙 20:48, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a run-of-the-mill gaming/gambling trade thing, Delete. IgelRM (talk) 16:44, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Definitely one of the companies of all time with minimal notability. This company is definitely not a sigma. MimirIsSmart (talk) 03:29, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep looks like the biggest or one of the top companies in its field. Though it currently has pretty pr-ish and superficial sources, but I found some good coverage in Malta news, and paywalled one on the German FAZ. Also, Maltabusinessweekly and Malta Today presented already in the article cover the subject in detail. Surprisingly, a random event I found during a search, organized by this company, attracted 25,000 visitors. The page should be reduced and cleanedup for neutrality.--Loewstisch (talk) 09:08, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have knowledge of Maltese journalism but please link even paywalled articles (It takes additional effort trying yo verify with the FAZ site search function. Also how many visitors were reported at an event does not give WP notability.IgelRM (talk) 14:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – I initially considered deletion, but later realized that better sources exist, and the group page focuses more on its significant international events rather than just the company itself. In general, the sources discuss events extensively and their impact, for example, on Malta's economy, as the subject is a major event organizer in several countries, including Brazil. There is substantial coverage in Portuguese about Sigma and its local subsidiary and with descriptions of local events organized by it. I think the page should be re-focused to include these events and their impact. --Welcome to Pandora (talk) 12:51, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:59, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: All available coverage is press releases or entirely based on company announcements, failing independence. Keep !voters should list specific sources so they can be evaluated. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 04:49, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as has substantial coverage in Malta national press: Talk.mt [4]

The SiGMA Group, a leading organization in the iGaming and emerging technologies sector, recently hosted the world's largest gaming festival in Malta. The event took place at the MFCC Ta' Qali and attracted approximately 25,000 delegates, 1,000 exhibitors, and 200 start-ups representing over 80 countries. The five-day event combined three major summits: SiGMA iGaming Summit, AIBC Summit, and Med-Tech World Summit, serving as a platform for business networking, knowledge sharing, and collaboration among industry leaders, experts, and innovators. The SiGMA Europe Malta Summit has demonstrated a measurable economic impact on Malta. The event is estimated to generate economic activity equivalent to sustaining 950 full-time jobs annually across various sectors. This includes not only the gaming industry but also hospitality, retail, and manufacturing businesses that provide services and products linked to the event and its participants.

The influence on Malta’s tourism sector was also notable, with visitors to the summit occupying over 60% of the country’s 4- and 5-star hotel beds during their stay — significantly higher than the usual 40% occupancy rate seen in November. The 2019 SiGMA Malta event contributed approximately €6 million in value added to the Maltese economy through both the event itself and tourist expenditure, representing 0.05% of the country’s total value added. Data from 2019 also indicates that firms in Malta operating within sectors tied to the SiGMA event directly contributed €194 million in value added to the economy, accounting for 7% of the total value added in those industries. SiGMA Group has expanded its global presence with a series of international events planned across five continents in 2023. The expansion includes the launch of SiGMA Africa in Kenya in January, marking the organization's first dedicated African event. Later in the year, SiGMA will participate in The Maleth Project III, supporting Malta’s third space bioscience research mission.

another from Times of Malta:

SiGMA Group’s biggest show to date closed its doors last week after three days packed with conferences, workshops, a high energy expo floor, and premier networking events. Official numbers put the number of attendees for the show at just over 15,000, making SiGMA’19 the group’s biggest ever event. Live gaming and eye-catching stand designs made this year’s expo a feast for the senses. Exhibitors brought a global flavour to the summit, showcasing cutting-edge games and software, offering innovative industry solutions, and bringing crucial networking opportunities to delegates looking to make next-level connections and deals. With energy high throughout the three-day-event, the expo floor was the place to be for delegates looking to mix business with pleasure. The annual SiGMA start-up pitch also brought investment opportunities and sound business advice to start-ups looking to gain a foothold in the industry as they battled it out for the top prize. A fiercely-fought battle saw Bethereum crowned its winner for its social betting solution built on blockchain technology. --多少战场龙 (talk) 10:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Both are specifically covering events by the company and feel rather fluffy. IgelRM (talk) 15:01, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep the topic appears to be not an affiliate marketing, but event-organizer, the largest ongoing events in its niche. There are reports with good coverage on the company itself on the influence of Sigma group on Malta economy and the Sigma Group’s impact on Malta’s economy, contributing roughly one percent to GDP growth, which is notable. I've added the wpbefore good sources on economy impact to the page into a separate section. Maybe it will help. Old-AgedKid (talk) 16:13, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
None of these sources are independent. Source 1 is a press release, source 2 comes from this press release, source 3 is also a press release. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 20:06, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The second source is this press release. The first source is heavily promotional, which is indicative of a press release. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 20:03, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Will editors arguing to Keep this article provide links or, at least, references to articles providing SIGCOV that are not press releases? This is typical in AFD discussions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:58, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Cyprus. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jäger Rosenberg

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete or dratify per WP:BIO with WP:TOOSOON in mind. Several citations are repeated, but of the sources given, the only independent publishers are Coast Reporter and My Powell River Now, two small local news sites / blogs. The rest are primary sources from the NDP or Jäger Rosenberg himself. The coverage by the news sites is largely routine due to the current election cycle, with the only point of notability being Rosenberg's young age, which in my opinion is not enough for standalone notability.

If Rosenberg is elected next month in the federal election, then he would have a stronger case for having an article due to his notability as an MP. Until then, however, this article should remain in the draftspace, especially in its current state with citations being limited to primary sources or local coverage. Yue🌙 22:49, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Canada. Yue🌙 22:49, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I did not notice this before starting the AfC discussion, but Talk:Jäger Rosenberg#Nomination for deletion was started two days prior without an actual AfC being started. That discussion already contains arguments from other editors to delete / keep. Yue🌙 23:01, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Virginia McCullough case

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NEVENT. All of the sources are primary news reports which follow the trial with little outside commentary. Does not pass notability for crime specifically. News reports can be secondary, but none of the ones on this trial are because they are just recapping the legal process. The event did not have any specific consequences, news was largely localized, and there isn’t any coverage after the trial ended. This is also a PSEUDO biography of the perpetrator instead of an actual event article, which this also has issues with (pseudo isn’t a guideline but it does raise the question of whether we should judge this by criminal notability guidelines instead which this also fails). PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:48, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and United Kingdom. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:48, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:43, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:GNG with extensive, international coverage in WP:RS (including just what's already cited in the article) and even a documentary retelling the story 5 years after the event ([5]). Does need a rename to focus on the murders, but that's not for WP:AFD. Longhornsg (talk) 03:10, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Is it actually international? All coverage I could find was local or localized to England. And most of the coverage I did find was trial updates. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:14, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Hyman (TV personality)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repost of previously deleted and salted material: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Hyman * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:39, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Authors, Women, Television, Law, Politics, California, and Florida. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:59, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, unsalt the “Kelly Hyman” page and move to that title. A lot has changed in the seven years since the page was deleted and salted. SIGCOV which post-dates the prior deletion now exists on the article. Frank Anchor 15:11, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep due to becoming notable since the last AfD. Bearian (talk) 01:23, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:47, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Live in Northampton, MA

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album without significant coverage, previously draftified, also extensively BLARed at the redirect with history now located at Special:History/Live In Northampton, MA, so we might as well get a final decision on this. Bobby Cohn (talk) 19:52, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Bobby Cohn (talk) 19:55, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:21, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Found only one critic's review, from AllMusic. Does not meet WP:NALBUM. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 00:10, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I don't see how this album is any less notable than most of the the other 20-odd releases from the King Crimson Collector's Club which have articles on Wikipedia; are they all to be deleted too? Sure, these things don't sell enough to get in the charts, but they are important documents of a highly influential band - King Crimson - which is now no more. If anything, I would argue that the Projekcts releases such as this one are MORE notable than many King Crimson live releases, due to their very rarity; only a handful were ever released. Robert Fripp, now nearly 80 years old, has regularly been voted one of the best guitarists on the planet and I believe that future generations will be thankful that we have documented all of his work here. There will be no more KCCC releases, and in a decade or so it is likely that Fripp's website will disappear too, leaving future music lovers looking to us for information on a remarkable talent (and I say that as an ex-pro musician myself.) In comparison, consider Frank Zappa, a musician of the same generation held in similarly high esteem by a broadly similar audience. Since his death there have been over 60 archive releases from his estate, each one no doubt selling only a few thousand copies to a dedicated fan-base, just as Live in Northampton, MA has done. Every one of them has an article on Wikipedia. Nectar3 (talk) 23:04, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:44, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I agree with Nectar 3's arguments. Orlando Davis (talk) 23:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Black Parade/Living with Ghosts

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In this discussion, a consensus was found that, outside of very special circumstances, individual articles on album reissues probably don't make that much sense, even taking into account notability. However, as I mentioned, there are some special circumstances that were highlighted in the discussion; an example of this was OK Computer OKNOTOK 1997 2017, where the material about the reissue is so abundant and in-depth that trying to properly summarize it on the original OK Computer article would've been next to impossible.

Unfortunately, The Black Parade/Living With Ghosts, the 10th anniversary reissue of The Black Parade, is not one of those album reissues to where I feel that a split is justified. All that happened with this reissue can be easily summarized by it's paragraph that is already present in Release and promotion section of the Black Parade article. Maybe a sentence or two could be added to summarize what kinds of demos and songs were completely cut yet are present here on "Living with Ghosts" (e.g. give a mention to songs like "Emily" and whatnot) but beyond that there's not much that gives this article much of a strong reason to exist, per WP:MERGEREASON. Furthermore, the anniversary reissues for several albums like The Black Parade, such as American Idiot, summarize its reissue in the main article rather than through a spinout, even if it has 4x the listening material to the original work.

But let's say that MERGEREASON and the linked discussion weren't enough, how does the reissue hold up to WP:NALBUM? There are a few things generally looked for by this policy: whether the album charted or received any certifications, if it is covered by several reliable, secondary sources in non-trivial/announcement fashion (i.e. meeting the general notability guidelines), or if it won any awards. However, none of these on their own would automatically make an album or musical work in general notable. The reissue charted in only four regions, and for a very short period of time, with no certifications. Only two reviews of the album were published: this fairly in depth one by AllMusic, and then this one by Rock Sound. Unfortunately, Rock Sound's review barely constitutes as a "review", and is just a few sentences long. No critical commentary is present here. And obviously, as an album reissue for a band that quite literally did not exist at the time it was published, it did not receive any awards. There is this article by the Alternative Press that could be fairly useful, but it's not necessarily a review and I would more or less rather use it as a source for production info behind The Black Parade, because obviously, the songs that were strapped during its production are relevant to that article.

With all of that being said, I firmly believe that this article does not stand its ground on its own and should probably be redirected to The Black Parade. And since this article's material has theoretically already been merged into the main album article, that is why I have chosen AFD as the venue for this discussion and not set up a merge proposal on the album talk pages. λ NegativeMP1 03:43, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. λ NegativeMP1 03:43, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I contributed to the Music Project discussion that was referenced at the beginning of this nomination, and I don't think a consensus was reached on how to handle the nascent craze for reissues of old albums that are poofed up to look like totally new items (or not). Instead we determined the need for some sort of new WP policy on the matter and I'm not sure if much happened after that. That is relevant here because this MCR reissue could be easily merged back to the original album under older definitions of "reissue", though it did make the charts under its own precise title in 2016, so maybe it doesn't fit that old definition. The ensuing discussion here is likely to include a lot of uncertainty. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:06, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The way that I thought the discussion ended was in a decent enough consensus that album reissues may not exactly need their own articles, new or old, even if notable. Either way, I believe I've made my case that the material here should likely just be merged into a paragraph or two in the main Black Parade article. Especially since it likely does not meet WP:GNG on its own due to the lack of critic reviews. If the discussion goes against that though, then I suppose it is what it is. λ NegativeMP1 18:49, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I believe that the album passes WP:NALBUM. There isn't a requirement of how many national charts an album needs to appear on, but being in the top 15 in the UK, Australia, and Scotland national charts seems notable. Additionally, while there are only a handful of reviews of the album, there are also several articles where the album's promotion is the subject due to its obscure promotion as MCRX, and the mass reaction in the rock music scene and notable rock musicians due to the speculation of a band reunion. While I may be biased as the article's creator, I believe the content is significant and notable per multiple criteria in NALBUM. Sekyaw (talk) 16:18, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 21:14, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus right now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eagle 987

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable racecar that ran in one race series. No secondary sourcing in the article, nor could I find any online from a basic search. Initially tagged this for single source and not meeting GNG, and an editor responded by adding two database entries that don't say a word about the car. The article calls it "entirely unsuccessful" though the sole source that says anything about the car (from its manufacturer, so both primary and non-independent) doesn't even support that. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:24, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:24, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of things, if you look at the sources i added, they are for the results, and 12th wasn't in the points for the series, so as I stated, it was unsuccessful, regardless of what Eagle had to say about the matter. Vantage-TWR (talk) 23:36, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it stands, it's a clear GNG failure, but there is a potential alternative to deletion here if sources can improve - merging this with Eagle 997 and then adding other Eagle products to List of chasses made by Eagle or something similar. SportingFlyer T·C 09:36, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldnt the creation of that list require also the deletion of all the other cars in Category:Eagle racing cars though? Vantage-TWR (talk) 22:17, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Those can be taken to their own individual AFDs if you see fit. The topic of this discussion is the Eagle 987. Frank Anchor 02:12, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Currently fails GNG but redirecting it to Eagle 997 and adding to suggested list by SportingFlyer would be best course here. Nyasalones (talk) 13:34, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and possible selective merge per SportingFlyer. Fails GNG due to lacking the SIGCOV needed for a standalone article. Frank Anchor 14:46, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I hope the participants arguing for Deletion can be more clear in what they are arguing for because you are also stating that you are for a Redirection and/or Merge. There can only be one outcome so please don't give a closer different options.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i personally think that a list should be made of the Eagle indy/champ car chassis, then this and the other Eagle cars will be redirected to said list Vantage-TWR (talk) 23:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:43, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Patriarch_Amos_of_Jerusalem

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Patriarch Amos of Jerusalem

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Search for Patriarch Amos of Jerusalem

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Search for Amos of Jerusalem

This is a duplicate of Amos of Jerusalem. Even the text is largely the same. Wikibelgiaan (talk) 22:23, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 March 18. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:44, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Amos of Jerusalem. It would be a helpful redirect. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:17, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Palestine. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:18, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This is technically the older article of the two, Amos of Jerusalem is slightly newer. Both created by the same person. I would lean towards keeping this one's article history, but moving it to the other's title. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 23:30, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: as the older of the two mostly identical articles, but move this article to Amos of Jerusalem after closing per Darth Starbro. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:47, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It's not clear to me what editors are advocating. Is it a straight Keep or a Merge? The closure of this AFD is separate from any future actions to Move or Rename this article which can be handled later by editors.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Popplewell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I originally tagged this BLP about a journalist as having notability issues in 2023. I have carried out WP:BEFORE, and added a reference to the time he spent on an uninhabited island as a teenager, which got some coverage. WP:BLP1E applies, however, as I can't find other independent, reliable sources to demonstrate that he is not a low-profile person. I don't think he meets WP:NJOURNALIST. Tacyarg (talk) 23:25, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, News media, and England. Tacyarg (talk) 23:25, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:32, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Odin's Horns

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N. As far as I can see, only one source in the article - Medieval.eu - could qualify as a WP:RS, but it is about a different symbol/character with horns and doesn't mention the article's subject at all. The unreliable sources have the three horns as a variation of the triskelion, but I don't support redirecting the page there, as I can't find any RS that calls it Odin's Horns. The scholarly material I find about the Snoldelev Stone just describes it as three interlaced horns, without giving it a name or making connections to mythology. Ffranc (talk) 10:56, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Ffranc (talk) 11:00, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. Ffranc (talk) 11:00, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paganism-related deletion discussions. Ffranc (talk) 11:00, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I find there are RS books which make the connection between this rune on the Snoldelev Stone and Norse mythology. For example, this one refers to it as (a symbol of the Odhinic Cult) while another suggests the the Triskele here is doubtless the Mark of Thor). I haven't yet found it referred to as Odin's Horns though. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 00:42, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Edred Thorsson is the name Stephen Flowers uses when he writes about his personal occult practice. He might be the originator of viewing this as an Odinic symbol, so it's an interesting find, but it's not a reliable source. The other book from 1868 may or may not refer to an established theory from that time, but it doesn't seem to have coverage in more recent works, even as a historical view. I guess it could still be added to the article about the Snoldelev Stone, with attribution and date for the source. Ffranc (talk) 11:29, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Regarding the 19th-century book that calls it the Mark of Thor, I read the source it points to, and it's a misunderstanding: it's the swastika (which also appears on the Snoldelev Stone) that has been interpreted as a symbol for Thor, not the three horns. This thesis has some coverage in the Wikipedia article swastika (Germanic Iron Age). Ffranc (talk) 10:01, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's a few pages further down in the book that Muller writes about the Triskele symbol as Odin's Mark. But you're correct: only the swastika symbol is cited to Snoldelevstenen. However, the Wikipedia article on Valknut references the "Triple Horn of Odin" on page 163 of Rudolf Simek's Dictionary of Northern Mythology. Any chance to check the accuracy of that? — CactusWriter ^(talk) 00:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Simek has one sentence where he writes that they may or may not be variations of the same symbol. He doesn't call it Odin's horns or anything of the like. He also mentions the picture stone from Lillbjärs, which has both a valknut and three interlaced horns. I'll add that to the Snoldelev Stone's article. Ffranc (talk) 13:27, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for checking on that, Ffranc. Much appreciated. Here though is a more specific mention: Richard Cavendish writes that the "interlocked horns found on a rune stone in Snoldelev in Denmark was the sign of the god Odin" on page 1346 in volume 3 of Man, Myth & Magic An Illustrated Encyclopedia of the Supernatural. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 19:02, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I mean, there are reliable sources referring to this symbol, albeit under different names, but it still passes WP:N. Maybe a rename would be more appropriate if there was a more common name found for it, but I don't feel deletion is the way to go here. Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 00:08, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Sophisticatedevening: Please point to these sources. I have searched but not been able to find any. Ffranc (talk) 12:38, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  I noticed the [6] CactusWriter identified, this book here (pg. 206) and this one. This one might be referring to it but there's no illustration. There's a ton of jewelers that don't really count due to reliability but still have their own descriptions of it as well. Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 14:41, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  Only Signs and Symbols looks like it could be a reliable source, but it only has two sentences: "The stylized triple drinking horn is a symbol of Odin and in itself signifies strength and potency. It represents the three drafts of magical mead procured by Odin after a long quest." It's not the significant coverage needed for an article. I would also be hesitant about adding this to the Snoldelev Stone's article, since it says nothing about where this interpretation comes from (and doesn't even mentions the stone). Ffranc (talk) 10:01, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 21:56, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Salim Bullen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. The only two sources currently in the article are primary to the USL Premier Development League, while a WP:BEFORE came up with one sentence at [[7]] but nothing substantial. Let'srun (talk) 21:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Indiana, New York, and Oregon. Let'srun (talk) 21:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Zero WP:SIGCOV, and the same for his cousin mentioned in the article (Oral Bullen). Svartner (talk) 23:46, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tryon Coterie

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Functionally a single chapter. Reference to Baylor Lariat contains the single fact that it was founded in 1946, reference to chapter website have information accessible in archive.org. Naraht (talk) 21:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fraternities and sororities and Texas. Naraht (talk) 21:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fiona Fonseca

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An early- to mid-career liaison psychiatrist with some research fellowships, but doesn't meet WP:NACADEMIC nor general notability criteria. Scopus impact of 2, based on 3 publications; prizes aren't sufficient to reach notability; fellowships are routine ones in the profession (no honorary fellowships). Journal editorships are insufficient. Klbrain (talk) 20:56, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Sexuality and gender, and United States of America. Shellwood (talk) 21:05, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nowhere near a pass of WP:Prof or WP:GNG. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:41, 25 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ireland, Alabama, Michigan, and Minnesota. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:45, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychiatry-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:45, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 03:03, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delta Omega Epsilon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One accessible source beyond primary sources, even if accessible only school websites Naraht (talk) 20:55, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Fraternities and sororities. Naraht (talk) 20:55, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:02, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MAGA Communism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Twitter fad. Remsense ‥ 论 20:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United States of America. Remsense ‥ 论 20:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please tell me why this article is scheduled for deletion? LaparohMesa (talk) 20:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@LaparohMesa, the nom said it’s a “Non-notable Twitter fad”. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 21:04, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I personally think that it isn't "Non-notable". I think it is important to note people of the misinformation these fascists spread. LaparohMesa (talk) 21:07, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We don’t usually just right great wrongs. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 00:09, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and agree with the "Twitter fad" comment from OP. The article is based on sources that are not particularly reliable or notable: a Substack, some Youtube videos from a channel that barely cracks 30k views per video on a good day, and a couple of websites that look more like blogs. It doesn't deserves its own article. Could also be redirected to Jackson Hinkle who, from my understanding, it's their main "representative". Paprikaiser (talk) 21:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Jackson Hinkle - aside from the article currently being in a questionable state, it itself already seems to acknowledge at multiple points in the span of merely five paragraphs that "MAGA Communism" has a near-zero number of serious supporters and no real presence outside of the internet (seriously, about a third of the article is currently dedicated to explaining how unpopular its subject is), and the sources, as already stated by another editor, don't seem to be particularly excellent for proving the subject's notability. I fail to see how this is notable, or any reason to not redirect this page to Jackson Hinkle, which was already the case when it was created.

FiveInParticular (talk) 23:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep: Some coverage [8], [9]. Oaktree b (talk) 00:02, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There's also a few hits in a thesis and some communist newspapers in Gscholar, click on the link above. Oaktree b (talk) 00:04, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect back to Jackson Hinkle. Weak coverage by unreliable sources outside of Twitter does not indicate notability. The recreated article has the same citation issues as a previous rejected draft from 2023, i.e., lack of in-depth coverage by reliable sources. Yue🌙 00:53, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil's First Olympic Medal in Tennis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary article that doesn't expand on information already covered in other articles. ProtobowlAddict ^uwu! (talk | contributions) 20:40, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Sports, Olympics, Tennis, and Brazil. ProtobowlAddict ^uwu! (talk | contributions) 20:40, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I beleave my recent changes to the page add new information that are not on other pages and also improve the article, becouse of that I am against to the deletion of the article Haddad Maia fan (talk) 21:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unnecessary content fork. All of the information can be included in Tennis at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Women's doubles or either of the two players’ articles. I oppose a redirect to any of these because Brazil's First Olympic Medal in Tennis is a very unlikely search term. Frank Anchor 22:05, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails as WP:SPINOFF, the event itself is already notable and information about the tennis players' performance should be in Brazil at the 2020 Summer Olympics#Summary. And note that the article appears to have been created by a WP:SPA. Svartner (talk) 23:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The creator is hardly a SPA - they seem to edit a wide range of tennis articles, not a "very narrow area". PamD 08:34, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The topic is patently non-notable. However, sourced information should be merged into the two biographies. For instance, the section Laura Pigossi#2020–2021: Olympics debut and historic bronze medal is thin. Geschichte (talk) 08:12, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unnecessary, but include some content about this milestone, sourced, in Sport in Brazil#Tennis. PamD 08:37, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Trident Aviation DHC-5 crash

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deletion Could qualify for WP:RAPID but per what i left on one of the two IP accounts that have reverted my notability tag edits: "The accident being concerned in this article is a low fatality accident involving an african aircraft. as people such as Aviationwikiflight have stated previously, due to factors such as bad maintenance, aging aircraft and low amounts of news coverage low fatality aircraft accidents in Africa are generally not notable, see WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE, WP:NOTNEWS and the above mentioned WP:NOTABILITY tag for events for future guidance to understanding the notability guidelines for events." Lolzer3k 20:25, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Aviation, and Somalia. Lolzer3k 20:25, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heka (company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded by Guessitsavis, deprodded by now-blocked sock; bringing to AfD for clarity. I am skeptical of WP:NCORP. The sources are generally junky press-release type pieces. Note that Bru Times News appears to be a PR firms outlet, or that seemed to be the consensus when this sock ring was last active. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 20:21, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 20:21, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Sources seem to be all press release churnalism. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 03:07, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LoveDrug

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG. No notability and only some minor chart placements. I don't believe we need to create an article for every track off this album. Then we might as well create an article for "Happy Mistake" from Lady Gaga's Harlequin album, which at least received significant media coverage due to its live performance. Sricsi (talk) 20:08, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music. Sricsi (talk) 20:08, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per GNG and OKFORK. WP:NSONG says, "Notability aside, a standalone article is appropriate only when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." The song has charted in multiple countries and the entry is already expanded beyond stub status. I'm voting the same way I have for the other Lady Gaga songs recently nominated for deletion: given the chart performance, news coverage, and amount of content here, I'd prefer to see this article expanded and improved, not deleted. This is a helpful encyclopedia entry and I'm bummed to see a deletion nomination immediately after being accepted at Articles for Creation. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:41, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Chart placements are completely irrelevant. Fails NSONG, is not the subject of multiple in-depth pieces from reliable sources. NSONG specifies album reviews don’t matter for establishing notability. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 20:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Completely irrelevant" isn't correct. It's certainly a factor, just not generally enough on its own. Sergecross73 msg me 22:58, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this only has been covered within album reviews, which aren't enough to warrant a song page as WP:NSONG makes clear. Contrary to what Another Believer seems to suggest when giving an out-of-context quote, no depth from those can compensate for failing notability criteria. Charts (or lack thereof) become entirely moot when there's little to no coverage outside of album reviews or commentary from those who were involved with working on the track. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:28, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: to the album. There isn't coverage in Gnews, the song only came out this month, less than 3 weeks ago. TOOSOON at this point. I'd wait before creating an article on a newly released song, for the simple fact that it's not been in the public eye long enough to get critical reviews or gain much traction; charting at 88 and 103 aren't signed of notability. If it was in the top 10, that would be different. It maybe drop off the charts next week and we'll never hear about it again. Oaktree b (talk) 00:09, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. An existing page was hijacked to write about an software engineer of the same name. As the hijack has been reverted, the discussion is no longer about the article Jared Mills. In the future, two deletion discussions may be opened: (1) If someone believes the rugby player to warrant deletion, someone may open a deletion discussion for him. (2) If a new article is posted about the software engineer, someone may open a deletion discussion for him. (non-admin closure)‎ Geschichte (talk) 08:16, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jared Mills

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

references don't actually prove the claims they are attached to, and there's no evidence of notability (all searches come up empty except for deer hunting) and also mainly advertises his (vanity/self-published) book. (This is my first AFD, apologies if I messed something up) All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 20:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 20:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All of this information is written objectively from a neutral perspective about this person and NOT used as a "soapbox". soapbox definition: A soapbox is a raised platform on which one stands to make an impromptu speech, often about a political subject. The term originates from the days when speakers would elevate themselves by standing on a wooden crate originally used for shipment of soap, or other dry goods, from a manufacturer to a retail store. Bitsbard (talk) 20:15, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Nevada. Shellwood (talk) 20:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Restore it back to the original [article] about an entirely different Jared Mills. It should not have been changed in this way in the first place. 203.28.247.64 (talk) 20:27, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This page is a subject of a “hostile takeover” by Bitsbard. I believe the rugby player should be notable. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 21:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. I think Jared Mills the AI engineer is more notable. 2603:8082:3400:9:45B9:E77F:D8CD:F2F1 (talk) 22:56, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If the AI engineer is "more notable" then the existing article should have been moved to Jared Mills (rugby league) and then new article can be created rather than overwriting what is there. EdwardUK (talk) 23:15, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Uzor Ngoladi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NWRITER as a writer or journalist and fails WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:48, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Journalism, and Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:48, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clayton Cramer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposing deletion per WP:BASIC and WP:NACADEMIC. Cramer played an important role in a scandal about the book Arming America and is an adjunct professor at College of Western Idaho.^[1] I have found no evidence that he meets an NACADEMIC criterion and insufficient coverage for BASIC.

Of the current references, ^[2]^[3]^[4] are by Cramer; ^[5]^[6] are not about Cramer; ^[7] is run-of-the-mill primary election results. I found additional references^[8]^[9]^[10] that mention Cramer in passing, apropos his role in the Arming America scandal. Even if this coverage was more extensive, it would fail Wikipedia:BLP1E.

References

^ "Clayton Cramer | CWI Directory". College of Western Idaho. 2012-03-01. Retrieved 2025-03-18.
^ "What Clayton Cramer Saw and (Nearly) Everyone Else Missed". History News Network, George Mason University. January 6, 2003. Retrieved 26 February 2009.
^ Cramer, Clayton (March 2012). "Madness, Deinstitutionalization & Murder" (PDF). Engage. 13 (1). Federalist Society: 37–43. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 23, 2020. Retrieved May 22, 2012.
^ My Brother Ron: A Personal and Social History of the Deinstitutionalization of the Mentally Ill. Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. 2012. ISBN 978-1477667538.
^ "Oct. 25: Michael Bellesiles Resigns from Emory Faculty". Emory University. October 25, 2002. Retrieved 26 February 2009.
^ "The Bancroft and Bellesiles". History News Network, George Mason University. December 13, 2002. Retrieved February 26, 2009.
^ "2008 Primary Election Results Legislative Totals". Archived from the original on May 1, 2012. Retrieved May 17, 2009.
^ Lindgren, James; Bellesiles, Michael A. (2002). "Fall from Grace: Arming America and the Bellesiles Scandal". Yale Law Journal. 111 (8). The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc.: 2195. doi:10.2307/797645. JSTOR 797645. SSRN 692421.
^ Wilson, J (Jan 2002). "The Scandal of Arming America. (Stranger in a Strange Land)". Books & Culture. 8 (1): 4–6.
^ Hoffer, Peter Charles (2007). Past imperfect: facts, fictions, fraud, American history from Bancroft and Parkman to Ambrose, Bellesiles, Ellis and Goodwin. History. New York: PublicAffairs. ISBN 978-1-58648-445-3.

userdude 19:37, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Conservatism, Libertarianism, and Firearms. userdude 19:37, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There might be notability with the correction around the book, but these are sourced only to educational websites. Rest seems non-notable and I can't pull up coverage on this individual we can use. Oaktree b (talk) 19:54, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The only sources you can find are interviews with a few universities, that don't help notability. Oaktree b (talk) 19:55, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - he's not really an academic as an adjunct; he's notable as a gun advocate, which is shown by the coverage. This is not an endorsement of his views. Bearian (talk) 01:26, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The only scandal about Michael Bellesiles book, Arming America, was the content of the book itself and the fact that virtually all the purported history contained in the book was fraudulent. How this should in any way be cited as a reason for deleting a Wikipedia article on Clayton E. Cramer, who has published several historical books none of which have been accused of using falsified source material, is incomprehensible. Wally3438 (talk) 10:18, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GrabUp - Talk 19:41, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maryam Riaz Wattoo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She does not meet WP:GNG, as most references covering her only mention her in relation to her sister Bushra Bibi, who is the wife of former prime minister Imran Khan. Apart from that, she lacks significant coverage to warrant notability. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 15:25, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Women, and Pakistan. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 15:25, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, she is related to the first lady and the ex PM and was instrumental in establishing their relationship.

I would also justify her addition on the following grounds:

She was the head of Pakistan's largest political parties chapter in the UAE for almost a decade and represented the voices of almost 500k expats. She was instrumental in securing the majority of funding for PTI's early political activities.

She was the official representative for the UAE, a major Islamic county, to the OIC, the largest Muslim governing body in the world.

She's also a leading specialist in education policy and sits on the Times Higher Education board of advisors, which is the world's largest education policy institution.

She is also active in Pakistani politics and is commonly seen on most news channels and podcasts, and as such is well known by the Pakistani diaspora.

I would try to approach this from the lense of the Pakistani and Islamic community. She is of course unknown out of these domains but fairly well known within. Shahroze (talk) 16:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We use a global lens, her ethnicity has no bearing on notability here. We require extensive sourcing about the individual that show they are notable. Oaktree b (talk) 18:06, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was not referring to her ethnicity, rather that she is a notable figure in certain demographic. As per Wikipedia Policy ("overzealous deletion"), I believe deleting this page of a notable figure to a certain demographic will violate the policy. Shahroze (talk) 18:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: as per official Wikipedia policy - Overzealous deletion:

Section 2: **Articles you are not interested in** – some topics are of interest only to some people, but since Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, articles that interest some people should be kept. Shahroze (talk) 16:35, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Well, there are zero citations for her work as an academic, so not notable there. I can only find articles about her relationships and food she gave to people, nothing that helps notability. She could perhaps get a mention in the protests mentioned in the Guardian article now used for sourcing, but she doesn't seem to be notable otherwise. Oaktree b (talk) 18:05, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GrabUp - Talk 19:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shastra Nethralaya

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG. In a WP:BEFORE search, a lack of WP:SIGCOV was clear, and most of the references in the article itself refer to a specific education principal as opposed to demonstrating coverage or notability of the organization itself. Honestly comes across as somewhat promotional. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:20, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Hinduism. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:20, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Hey man im josh I understand your concern but this organisation does not sell anything, all teachings are free of charge on the website and on youtube. The citations are not many, only some through wikipedia. I tried to add these but were removed. Please advise what can I change. YamunaIRE (talk) 22:24, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GrabUp - Talk 19:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla house

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be an official prototype (vs Cybercab) or proposed product other than appearance at a couple random shows. Not significant coverage to support notability on its own. Could just be mention in Tesla Energy. ZimZalaBim ^talk 18:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:00, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep

This prototype/concept has been shown in numerous Australia cities and at two LA Auto Show. Wikipedia has many pages of prototype/concept products. Wikipedia does not exclude prototypes, upcoming products if they are noteworthy. This is noteworthy prototype, not from some small un-noteworthy company.

If you deleted this page you need to remove other prototype/concept pages (go remove these first):

WikiHouse Not a product - go remove in first!
Xanadu Houses
Futuro
Edison Portland Cement house
Volvo VESC
Porsche 989
Pontiac Club de Mer
Pontiac Bonneville Special
Mercedes-Benz C111
Mazda Suitcase Car
Airbus CityAirbus
Big Mac (computer)
City of Everett (aircraft)
Fiat ESVs
Lanchester petrol-electric car
Pacerailer
Single-hole cassette
Xerox NoteTaker
Yehudi lights

and more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Telecineguy (talk • contribs)

Note that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't a very convincing arguement. Need to show the merits of this particular subject and whether it meets WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 18:02, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not seeing a clear GNG pass - the sources are all promotional or are about a different house. (I actually thought this was going to be an ill advised AfD about the house in Smiljan.) SportingFlyer T·C 02:30, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GrabUp - Talk 19:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The sources listed in the article are promotional. The recently added source from "gatorrated" is an unreliable blog post with what appears to be an AI generated image that only exists on the blog. I am not seeing any developments on the tesla house since ~2018.

Agree with Zala that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a convincing argument to keep. Many of the articles listed by telecineguy are well-sourced and establish the notability of their subjects with independent, non-promotional material (e.g. City of Everett (aircraft)) not to mention many led to actual products.

Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 21:32, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

William Smoot

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO, including all three prongs for WP:ANYBIO. Contains only one independent, verifiable source by Ryland (1955), who only mentions him for half a paragraph. Google only gave results for different persons under this name, as did JSTOR. I was able to find one other source from the local government, which cites Ryland. PROD was removed by an editor, who suggested bringing to AfD. ThaesOfereode (talk) 18:11, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Religion. ThaesOfereode (talk) 18:11, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Virginia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:23, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I do not see evidence of a WP:GNG or WP:NBIO pass. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:52, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are going to enjoy this, ThaesOfereode. Observe footnote 16 on page 251 of Ryland 1955. Then cross-reference that to the list of sources on page 351. Guess which 1902 book is Ryland's own source! ☺ Uncle G (talk) 06:35, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can't believe I missed that! Well, I think it's probably safe to say that this should probably be a delete then. Incredible. Thanks for the laugh! ThaesOfereode (talk) 13:16, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge selectively to Occoquan, Virginia. Washington Post article here[10], Landmark designation of his church here[11] lists other sources. Jahaza (talk) 16:55, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GrabUp - Talk 19:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lizzie Waterworth

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've declined a speedy deletion request on this—voicing the titular character in a major TV series is obviously a credible claim of significance—but sourcing this meagre is clearly not appropriate in a BLP. ‑ Iridescent 17:50, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Television. ‑ Iridescent 17:50, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: She is apparently a BAFTA-nominated individual and has written a book [12]. That source doesn't help notability, but at least confirms these facts. The BAFTA nomination would suggest notability, but I don't have enough coverage found to !vote at this point. Oaktree b (talk) 17:57, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
She's voiced named characters in notable productions, but I can't find much out there as far as sourcing goes. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:15, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:23, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Comics and animation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:02, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment She was nominated for a British Academy Children's Award in the Performer category in 2019 for her role in Horrid Henry [13], and has also voiced named characters in the two other series mentioned in the article, plus 20 of 35 episodes of The Sandman (podcast) and all episodes of Tinpo (as well as named characters in other series that don't have WP articles like an animated version of Isadora Moon, 50 episodes of Mush-Mush and the Mushables and 35 episodes of Marcus Level. That would see her meet WP:NACTOR, but I have so far found very little independent sourcing, even to confirm her roles. I'll see if I can find more. RebeccaGreen (talk) 16:30, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GrabUp - Talk 19:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sheldon Parkinson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Player appears to fail WP:GNG due to highly underwhelming senior career. Soccerway lists him as eight games for Phoenix in the USL Pro in 2013, and one cup game for the Brooklyn Italians the year afterwards. That's it. Though Phoenix as a club and definitely the USL as a league are notable as themselves, notability of biographies is not inherited and I do not see WP:GNG from my searches, only run of the mill mentions in team updates and match reports Unknown Temptation (talk) 18:44, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, New Jersey, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Jamaica-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:31, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Zero WP:SIGCOV. Svartner (talk) 23:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Lloyd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From the references in the article, this player was drafted and traded. Played one game as a running back, but never touched the ball -- no attempts, no carries, no stats. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT, since trivial coverage does not support notability. mikeblas (talk) 18:41, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, American football, and Wisconsin. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:31, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Like pretty much every other modern NFL player ever, Lloyd meets GNG, see e.g. Daily Citizen (2) and The Forum. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:37, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per BeanieFan11's findings. Sigcov exists and (to the best of my knowledge) players in the modern NFL are inherently notable. Jordano^5³ 00:01, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The sources provided by BeanieFan11 have the requisite WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:SPORTSCRIT as they each contain multiple sentences of in-depth coverage about the subject. The article could use better citations but WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. Let'srun (talk) 00:56, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pain-free consciousness

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A neologism. The term "pain-free consciousness" does not appear to be widely used in medical, philosophical, or bioethical literature.

Searches in PubMed, Google Scholar, and other academic databases return very few (if any) results using this exact phrase in a defined or standardised way. The page itself lacks strong inline citations to high-quality secondary sources (e.g., textbooks, peer-reviewed reviews, position papers). Much of the content seems to reflect original synthesis or philosophical interpretation rather than summarising an established topic. The page reads more like an exploration or argument for a concept, rather than a description of a recognised term. Klbrain (talk) 18:37, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy, Medicine, and Psychology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:32, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The sources aren't talking about this. They are talking about chronic pain, the history of philosophy, and the mechanisms of pain and how it can be alleviated. From these has been built a fairly woolly original research thesis that even ends on the clichéd "further research is needed" note. Project:no original research applies. Delete. Uncle G (talk) 21:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aku Odinkemelu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Source either fail WP:INDEPENDENT or are WP:DOGBITESMAN. Nothing to establish notability. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Law, and Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, China, Switzerland, Massachusetts, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

REDCLIFFE Partners

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repost of previously deleted and salted material: WP:Articles for deletion/Redcliffe Partners * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Companies, and Ukraine. Shellwood (talk) 17:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Of the sources cited: 6 are press releases published by the EBA, 2 are press releases published by the American Chamber of Commerce in Ukraine, 2 are press releases on the company's own WWW site, 1 is a press release published by the USIDFC, 1 is a press release on the company's LinkedIn page, 1 is a listing page that is empty, 1 the Financial Times is behind a paywall, 1 is a law firm directory listing, 2 are press releases/autobiography by Clifford Chance, 3 are ranked directories of companies, 3 are shortlistings for awards (not actually winning them), 1 is an interview published by a marketing consultancy, 2 are dead links, 1 is a press release on gazeta.ua, 2 are ranking listings and an interview on yur-gazeta.com, 1 is a list of corporate sponsors of an event, 1 simply mentions that the firm handled a contract, 2 are page not founds, 3 are about law and business practice in Ukraine in general (2 not even mentioning this company, the other quoting its CEO), 1 is about a person who worked at the company applying for another position, 4 are CEE Legal Matters recycling press releases, 2 are CEE Legal Matters covering itself, 1 is CEE Legal Matters interviewing executives, 2 are CEO interviews by the Kyiv Post, 1 is a recycled press release by the Kyiv Post, 1 is a corporate puff piece in Comments.UA.
There is not a single reliable in-depth on-point independent source in the lot of them. This is egregious corporate puffery. Delete.
Uncle G (talk) 22:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ispmanager

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've declined a speedy deletion request on this—there isn't enough similarity with the page deleted in 2011 at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISPmanager (2nd nomination) for G4 to apply—but the same arguments still apply; I'm not seeing anything to indicate any particular significance. Web server software is most definitely not my area, so I'm perfectly willing to be convinced that this is in fact notable, but as it stands I'm seeing nothing to indicate that anything has changed in the last 14 years. ‑ Iridescent 17:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ‑ Iridescent 17:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Dorf (entrepreneur)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a procedural nomination completed incorrectly by Qinifer (talk · contribs), which reads:

This article does not meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines and lacks significant coverage in independent, reliable sources to demonstrate lasting encyclopedic value. Furthermore, this article has a long history of promotional editing, undisclosed paid editing, and conflict-of-interest violations, as documented on its Talk page. Multiple editors have repeatedly flagged its self-promotional tone, and past revisions contained material copied from the subject’s website. Given the pattern of promotional activity across multiple related articles (including Knitting Factory and City Winery), this article appears to exist to promote an individual and his business interests rather than provide an objective, verifiable encyclopedic entry. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:25, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Wisconsin. Shellwood (talk) 13:22, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:25, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm hesitant to !vote because the subject is friends with a high school friend of mind. I will note that the subject's son apparently used two different accounts to edit his father's article. I'm not sure if that's technically a violation of WP:SOCK or not. Bearian (talk) 11:43, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This article does not meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines, as it lacks significant coverage in independent, reliable sources that demonstrate lasting encyclopedic value. Beyond failing WP:GNG and WP:NORG, there is a long-documented history of promotional editing, undisclosed paid contributions, and conflict-of-interest violations that severely undermine its credibility as a neutral, encyclopedic entry. The talk page documents multiple instances of single-purpose accounts editing this article exclusively to promote Michael Dorf and his business ventures, to the extent that the article contains primarily PR content copied verbatim from Dorf's personal and business websites. The aforementioned accounts include editors flagged for conflict of interest, such as Eli the Great, ZacharyDorf, (two accounts proven to be his children) and Citywinery155 (an employee account). These accounts engaged in promotional edits, and in the case of ZacharyDorf, continued making undisclosed COI edits despite repeated warnings. An editor in this AfD discussion has also noted that Dorf’s son used multiple accounts to edit the article, with those edits consisting of copying and pasting PR content from Dorf’s business websites. I agree with the editor who pointed this item out: this constitutes a clear violation of Wikipedia’s sockpuppetry policy (WP:SOCK). Furthermore, WP:AUTOBIO states that subjects of biographies, their families, and their close associates should not edit their own pages due to inherent COI.

This article also fails WP:NOTINHERITED, as Dorf’s limited coverage largely stems from his association with Knitting Factory and City Winery, rather than any independent accomplishments. Even if his businesses had received significant coverage, that would not automatically confer notability upon him, per WP:NOTINHERITED. Additionally, per WP:BLP and WP:V, biographies of living persons must be supported by high-quality independent sources, and this article has a long history of failing to meet that standard. Many prior revisions contained self-promotional content, with some passages directly copied from Dorf’s website, reinforcing the lack of neutral, independently verifiable information. The media coverage surrounding Dorf is largely event-driven, tied to business ventures and short-lived paid PR-driven press coverage, rather than sustained, in-depth coverage that establishes lasting notability. WP:RUNNING and WP:NOTNEWS clarify that notability requires more than scattered mentions or business promotions.

Given the pattern of documented paid promotional activity across multiple related articles, which include Knitting Factory and City Winery, both of which have ongoing deletion or merge discussions, this article appears to exist to promote an individual and his business interests rather than provide an objective, verifiable encyclopedic entry. Per WP:GNG and WP:NORG, it does not meet inclusion criteria. Furthermore, given the extensive history of promotional editing, undisclosed COI violations, and failure to demonstrate lasting notability in independent sources, this article and its related pages do not serve as neutral biographical entries, but rather as a promotional effort linked to Dorf’s business ventures. Wikipedia is not a business directory (WP:NOTADIRECTORY) nor a platform for self-promotion (WP:PROMO). Per WP:NOTADVERTISING and WP:COI, deletion is the appropriate course of action. Qinifer (talk) 16:43, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:59, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 17:06, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WXWZ-LD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable LPTV. Mostly unsourced; some promotional content. Merge into List of television stations in Puerto Rico#LPTV stations. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Puerto Rico. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BlacVolta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable digital company; the sources are either paid or not with reliable coverage of the subject (based on interviews or press-releases) Unicorbia (talk) 16:30, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Ghana. Shellwood (talk) 18:05, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Another frivolous deletion nomination orchestrated by (Personal attack removed).Postit note warrior (talk) 21:13, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia already has enough low-quality African-subject stubsPostit note warrior (talk) 21:14, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above comments should be disregarded by the closer as they were made out of spite, and the self-proclaimed warrior is now blocked indefinitely. Geschichte (talk) 05:21, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WVDO-LD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable LPTV with lots of translators; no sources; outdated info. Merge into List of television stations in Puerto Rico#LPTV stations. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:29, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Puerto Rico. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:29, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LOGOS Research Group in Analytic Philosophy

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nom. Was a soft delete in August, but I agree with the original nom, Brunnaiz, "Non-relevant organization, the article is backed only by self-sources and there's information missing sources. In fact, the article was replicated in cawiki around the same time with the very same problems, which could even be viewed as cross-wiki spam." Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy, Organizations, and Spain. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I stand by my former opinion on this article. It was even deleted in Catalan Wikipedia. --Brunnaiz (talk) 18:53, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

StarDoc 134

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable operating system. No significant coverage found. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 16:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 16:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alireza Kiarashi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously salted as Alireza kiarashi. No clear evidence of notability, and riddled with promotional trivialities. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Iran. Shellwood (talk) 15:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talently

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NPRODUCT. No reliable source coverage, and I'm pretty sure the only purported independent coverage at all from TechRepublic is fake, as I could not find the reference. ~ A412 ^talk! 15:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ~ A412 ^talk! 15:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Looking at Internet Archive, it looks like the TechRepublic page was already non-existing in the only archived version, and searching for "Talently" on their website returns nothing. Looking at other sources, they are either irrelevant to notability (the ManifestV3 source, which also appears to be a malfunctioning link), primary, or also non-existing (HR Drive). Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 16:32, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Techrepublic was a wrong one and suggested to remove. Talently is searchable in Google Web Store https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/hire-app-developer-talent/pjhfikhiahmphpeiaapfdnhcmkphcmjn?authuser=0&hl=en , got Feaured badge and user review and real users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yass6240 (talk • contribs) 09:58, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Konotop (disambiguation)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since the merge of Battle of Konotop (2022) to Northern front of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in June 2024, there is only one article with "Battle of Konotop" in the title. That article is appropriately titled Battle of Konotop and has a hatnote pointing to the Northern front article. This DAB page is thus completely useless. I tried blanking and redirecting it [14], but was reverted by User:Bkonrad [15], so I am now here to request that this page be redirected to Battle of Konotop or deleted. Toadspike [Talk] 15:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disambiguations and Ukraine. Toadspike [Talk] 15:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, self-explanatory lack of ambiguity. HappyWith (talk) 17:41, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; AFAIC, this could have been done with technical request; only reason I reverted was to avoid having a page with "(disambiguation)" in title redirecting to an article, as that pretty much renders the point of having such redirects useless. older ≠ wiser 18:26, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I didn't realize that I can BLAR and then nominate for speedy deletion under G14. That feels wrong somehow but it looks like the rules allow it. Toadspike [Talk] 19:05, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:37, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chaitanya Singha Dev

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:GNG, There is no significant coverage in the cited sources. Koshuri ^(グ) 14:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, History, India, and West Bengal. Koshuri ^(グ) 14:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Mahler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do think this article passes WP:N. Most of the sources that mention him are about Moon Studios, the studio he co-founded, or the development process of the Ori games, but they are not necessarily about him. OceanHok (talk) 13:28, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Video games. OceanHok (talk) 13:28, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment, OceanHok. I appreciate the scrutiny regarding WP:N. I believe Thomas Mahler meets the General Notability Guideline (WP:GNG) due to significant coverage in reliable, independent sources that focus on him as an individual, not just Moon Studios or the Ori games. For example, the GamesIndustry.biz article "The making of Ori and the Blind Forest" (2015-03-23) provides detailed insight into Mahler’s personal background, his time at Blizzard, and his creative vision, beyond just the studio’s work. Similarly, the GamesRadar+ interview "Ori and the Will of the Wisps interview: Thomas Mahler on difficulty, storytelling, and more" (2020-03-10) centers on his design philosophy and leadership approach, highlighting his individual contributions. These sources, among others like the PC Gamer coverage of his role in No Rest for the Wicked’s development, offer substantial, non-trivial coverage of Mahler himself in secondary sources, independent of Moon Studios. While much of his recognition ties to the studio he co-founded, this is typical for creative directors, and the depth of personal focus in these articles supports his notability under WP:GNG. I’d welcome further discussion or suggestions to strengthen this! 84.242.10.82 (talk) 13:38, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:03, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:12, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only time I've seen this guy in the news was when he was accused of creating a toxic workplace. No mention of that in the article here though, instead we have an overly long promo/fluff piece that reads like it was AI generated. Seriously, look at some of these sentences: "Thomas Mahler’s career has significantly impacted modern game development, from the way games can be made to the way they are received." "Mahler’s work on Ori has had a lasting influence beyond just sales and awards. The games demonstrated that a small, remote team could produce an experience to rival big-budget studio productions, potentially influencing how future indie projects are perceived and funded." Even if other editors think he's notable, I'm not sure there's anything worth salvaging in the current article. I'd argue it needs WP:TNT either way. CurlyWi (talk) 18:35, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the IP editor above appears to be a WP:SPA who has previously attempted to sanitize any criticism[16][17] in the Moon Studios article. CurlyWi (talk) 19:00, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:08, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Merge a small part to the Moon Studios article? I'm not sure he's quite notable enough, but there's more than ample coverage about the workplace "issues". Oaktree b (talk) 14:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wero (payment)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I recommend the deletion of the Wero (payment) Wikipedia page due to a lack of notability, as it does not have sufficient independent coverage in reputable sources to demonstrate its significance in the mobile payment industry. Mapsama (talk) 13:40, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mapsama (talk) 13:40, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:08, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Coverage in RS [18], [19], [20]. [21], [22] Oaktree b (talk) 15:33, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural keep‎. No rationale presented by the nominator, and on their others, I very strongly advise re-editing them all with a statement with their own words. (non-admin closure) Nathannah • 📮 16:13, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shaparak (company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaparak_(company) Mapsama (talk) 13:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mapsama (talk) 13:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

FindSALT

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose the deletion of the FindSALT Wikipedia page due to its lack of notability, as it relies on limited sources that do not provide substantial independent coverage or establish its significance within the restaurant industry. Mapsama (talk) 13:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mapsama (talk) 13:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and United Arab Emirates. Shellwood (talk) 13:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lean Keep I lean toward keeping this article. There is independent coverage in gulf news and Conde Nast traveler. The fact that someone had to clarify that the restaurant in london is not from UAE also suggests notability to me.

Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 22:07, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ari Klinger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose the deletion of the Ari Klinger Wikipedia page due to insufficient notability, as it relies heavily on limited sources that do not provide significant coverage Mapsama (talk) 13:33, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mapsama (talk) 13:33, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 13:40, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:41, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eleos insurance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability, as it is primarily supported by limited sources that do not provide significant coverage Mapsama (talk) 13:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mapsama (talk) 13:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:40, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

David Mapley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient notability, as it relies on self-referential sources and lacks significant independent coverage from credible publications that establish him as a prominent figure within the financial industry. Furthermore, the content primarily focuses on specific legal cases without providing comprehensive context or wider recognition that meets Wikipedia's notability. Mapsama (talk) 13:28, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mapsama (talk) 13:28, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 14:05, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Law. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Caprinos Pizza

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

questionable notability, as it relies predominantly on sources too closely associated with the subject and lacks significant independent coverage in reputable publications. Additionally, the article presents a promotional tone, failing to provide enough credible, verifiable content to justify its presence as a standalone entry on Wikipedia. Mapsama (talk) 13:26, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mapsama (talk) 13:26, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 13:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

However, it is notable, the page documents an uprising multinational Pizza parlour, despite this, one of the few things I agree with is the fact there's too much promotional content, these are leftovers from when a caprinos employee tried to edit Wikipedia for their favor. If you CAN find reliable sources about the topic please link them below. - WinterJunpei :3 20:58, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MySyara

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

due to a lack of notability, as significant coverage from independent reliable sources is missing, and the content appears promotional in tone. Additionally, the article does not provide substantial historical context or unique insights that justify its standalone existence. Mapsama (talk) 13:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mapsama (talk) 13:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:44, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Beit Hall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability for 5 years. Suggest that there is little independent third party sources showing that this student accommodation is notable and WP:NOTEVERYTHING JMWt (talk) 13:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and United Kingdom. JMWt (talk) 13:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial College Halls of Residence

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little on the page to suggest that this topic has independent notability outside of Imperial College London. Suggest at best it could be merged because of WP:NOTEVERYTHING but also suspect that detailed guff about student accommodation is unlikely to be notable even there. JMWt (talk) 13:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and United Kingdom. JMWt (talk) 13:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose At least two of the current halls of residence and one former hall discussed in the article are notable as listed buildings per WP:GEOFEAT:

"Artificial geographical features that are officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level and for which verifiable information beyond simple statistics is available, are presumed to be notable."

There is also evidence of notability for other halls, with significant coverage in the Evening Standard and ITV News, as well as in the trade magazine The Construction Index. That much of the page is sourced back to Imperial does not affect notability. Robminchin (talk) 15:07, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wojciech Tyc

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable footballer. No sources found beyond profiles from databases. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 12:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Sportspeople. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 12:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Poland. Shellwood (talk) 13:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I feel like almost no effort is being put into many of these noms. He played numerous first-tier matches in the 1970s in Poland/France and still today gets interviewed by many newspapers as a "legend" and a "famous" footballer of the 1970s. He's frequently consulted today for his opinions on Polish football, e.g. this ("Wojciech Tyc, a member of the legendary Odra Opole"), this ("Wojciech Tyc was a terror on the football pitch in Poland in the 1970s. He was a striker who helped change the image of the Opole team from a small team to one that the biggest names had to reckon with."), this, this ("Wojciech Tyc, a former long-time striker of Odra Opole and a representative of Poland ... [he] represented the Opole club in the years 1972-1981. He played in the senior Polish national team once, in 1977, in a friendly match with Sweden. He was also on a long list of players considered in the composition of the World Cup in 1978, and in subsequent years he also played in the Olympic team. After leaving Odra, he went to France, where he ended his career, playing successively for FC Valenciennes, Amiens SC and US Argentan. Many years after ending his career, he still closely follows the activities of the Polish national team") and this ("Wojciech Tyc is one of the legends of Odra Opole. For many seasons he was the club's best sniper, and in 1977 he even played in the Polish national team. For two months Tyc has been managing the new football centre on Północna Street. However, the councillors from the audit committee want to look into the form of his employment. The complaint in this matter is already in the city hall."). It is absolutely inconceivable that he would not have received in-depth coverage in Poland / France in the 1970s, when he was most prominent, given how highly he is still discussed today. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If he is so famous, why are there no good sources about him in his article?? WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 16:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A third of all of Wikipedia is in stub-condition. That the article is in poor quality in no way means that the subject is non-notable. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:26, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep – This is a case where the player's notability is linked to regional and offline material, thus the sources presented by BeanieFan11 point out the basics for the article to be maintained. Svartner (talk) 23:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Walker (musician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a writer and musician, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for writers or musicians. As always, neither writers nor musicians are automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their work exists, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on third-party coverage and analysis about their work -- but four of the nine footnotes here are just his own work being cited as metaverification of its own existence, two are blogs, one is a mere directory entry, and the only two nominally reliable sources in the bunch (one book and one improperly cited newspaper article) both just briefly namecheck Donald Walker without being about him in any sense, which is not the kind of coverage we need to see.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass GNG on much, much better referencing than this. Bearcat (talk) 12:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Bands and musicians, and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 12:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:44, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Männin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo for non notable short film. Lacks independent coverage, no sign of any reviews. Being screened and winning minor awards does not satisfy NFILM. Wanky promotional writing. One of multiple promo pieces largely created by the films production company. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, France, and Germany. Shellwood (talk) 12:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Die Tapferen Haende im Chaos der Zeit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo for non notable short film. Lacks independent coverage, no sign of any reviews. Being screened and winning minor awards does not satisfy NFILM. Wanky promotional writing. One of multiple promo pieces largely created by the films production company. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:43, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and France. Shellwood (talk) 12:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm taking a list at the claims. None of them establish notability.

The film never screened at any film festival that is so notable that it would be notable on that basis alone. It screened at Cannes, but not in any area that would establish notability. Cannes is exclusive, but not so exclusive (outside of Un Certain Regard) that appearing at it would equal notability. Film festival appearances are kind of a given and seen as a routine thing. They can make it more likely that coverage could exist, but it's never a guarantee.

The awards are largely unusable. The only one that might give partial notability is the Colorado festival, but I'll note that the coverage for this is either local Colorado papers or papers that are local to the award winners. Their wins aren't listed in places like Variety or similar - things that would help establish that the festival is notable per Wikipedia's guidelines. The IndieFest Film Awards and Accolade Competition are run by the same people and are a vanity award mill. They hold their festivals virtually and about four times a year. Basically everyone gets an award, usually as an award of merit or recognition judging by the October 2024 festival. There are entry fees and while that's not always a sign of a vanity award, legit festivals usually don't hold sales/discounts. They also do not make winners purchase their own award statues or stickers to decorate posters or DVDs. Shoot, the company doesn't even automatically give winners a letter announcing their win - they have to request them. I know that any form of award makes it easier to promote themselves in the business, but this company has always been one of the laziest and most obvious vanity awards out there.

There are no sources on the article as far as reviews and such go. This just doesn't appear to be a notable short film. I'll take a look for sourcing before making an official call, but offhand it doesn't look good. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Mika'ela Fisher. That did not take long. To be honest, I'm starting to seriously wonder if the director herself is even notable. I have been giving her the benefit of the doubt that she is, but the amount of promotional puffery and vanity awards makes me think that she might actually fail NDIRECTOR. Since there's a chance the studio might see this:

This is why you work with Wikipedia and try to follow editing, sourcing, and notability guidelines. Fisher might be notable (haven't checked for her in specific yet) but when you create vanity, WP:PUFFERY laden articles you make that person look less legitimate and non-notable by default. You are making your client look bad and you are poisoning the well for them on Wikipedia.

At bare minimum I can tell that the director's page needs to be razed and re-written to conform with Wikipedia's guidelines. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:06, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Altacit global

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spammy recreation of Altacit Global, which was nuked under G5 earlier; see also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Expertwikiguy (permalink to latest report). As for the company itself, much of its coverage is in the form of PR pieces, paid-for puff pieces like this, or some passing mentions with no further detail. Subject fails WP:NCORP and by a good margin. Java Hurricane 11:25, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Java Hurricane 11:25, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, removed another one from the Harvi/SI SEO farm. Most of the rest is directory listings, puff press. Very likely sock or another UDPE, but will let checkuser look at it. Sam Kuru (talk) 16:11, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Tamil Nadu. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:44, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yogodyan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero reliable in-depth sources in current article (2 of the 3 sources are deadlinks). Search turned up the same, zero in-depth from independent, reliable sources. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hinduism and West Bengal. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong Tang King Po College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no Substance in the article , the given source doesn't justify notability. Rahmatula786 (talk) 10:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Hong Kong. Rahmatula786 (talk) 10:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wahid Enitan Oshodi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable person according to wikipedia standarts 多少战场龙 (talk) 10:04, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 多少战场龙 (talk) 10:04, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Engineering, Sports, Tennis, and Nigeria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: Being the president of the African Table Tennis Federation helps him pass WP:ANYBIO and even WP:NTENNIS, and previously being a Commissioner for Youth, Sports, and Social Development helps him pass WP:NPOL (WP:NSUBPOL). Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:44, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: The subject passes WP:NPOL and WP:NTENNIS. He is currently the President of the African Table Tennis Federation, the former commisioner of Commissioner for Youth, Sports, and Social Development and former president of the Nigerian Table Tennis Federation. Ibjaja055 (talk) 13:01, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: Being a former commissioner alone is enough to speedy keep this, it clearly meets WP:NPOL. Idoghor Melody (talk) 13:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with the others, notable as Senate commissioner and NTTF president. KylieTastic (talk) 17:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per G7 by Cryptic. (non-admin closure)‎ Shellwood (talk) 12:40, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yousef Abo Zarad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies. The article lacks significant independent coverage from reliable sources that establish notability beyond his personal or professional activities Xrimonciam (talk) 09:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Xrimonciam (talk) 09:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine, Internet, Syria, and Germany. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Kate Corrigan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor fictional character; article sourced entirely to primary sources, a quick search didn't reveal any substantial secondary sources. Not notable. Josh Milburn (talk) 09:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Richard St George Mansergh-St George

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 17#Richard St George Mansergh-St George. Article was restored after being subject to a BLAR in 2019. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:03, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, Ireland, United Kingdom, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:: I found the copyright page [here] that has apparently been transcribed word of word. However, from what I see online it appears the subject is sufficiently notable to warrant an article and there are quite a few other independent sources that could be used to rewrite this, perhaps using some of this source to create perfectly acceptable article. Perhaps draftify or start a sandbox that can be worked on by some interested editors. ww2censor (talk) 11:56, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The original 4 line 2010 WP article contains the (mis-cast) words the name of 'St George' was assumed on inheriting his maternal uncle's property, Richard St George Mansergh-St George, the words following ‘Mansergh’ are inserted a little later here; the 2013 article by Matranga says the name of ‘St George’ following ‘Mansergh’ was assumed on inheriting his maternal uncle’s property, Richard St George Mansergh-St George. The Matranga article has a copyright date of 2012-13, but that does not push it back before the earliest WP version, nor do we know what the 2012 version of the Matraga article looks like. I don't see any sign in the WP article's history that it has been cut-and-pasted, instead it seems to have been developed a step at a time. It looks to me that either the Matranga article is the copyvio, or Matranga is one and the same as the main Wikipedia editor of our article.
All the best: Rich Farmbrough 14:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Note, I say mis-cast because the sentence implies that "Richard St George Mansergh-St George" is the property, not the uncle. I don't see this phraseology arising independently. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 14:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Comment: The main author has, on the talk page of the article, requested deletion, as they want the material only to appear on their web site, that being cited above. They previously requested this in 2019.
There is a note on the talk page that explains that this article is the origin of the external article, which has been there since 2013. Nominators for deletion are expected to check the talk page, this is part of the documented process. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 15:04, 25 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Keep: Meets WP:ANYBIO#3 with an entry in the Dictionary of Irish Biography. Curbon7 (talk) 20:20, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. In terms of the title/article, the subject demonstrably meets WP:NBIO and WP:GNG. In terms of the content, if there is a COPYVIO issue (and I personally do not follow or understand how that claim can be made by the editor making the claim), that issue can be addressed via WP:REVDEL. Rather than outright deletion of the title. Guliolopez (talk) 21:49, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shola Akinlade

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

should be removed due to the lack of independent, reliable sources to support the claims made in the article. Akinlade's notability may be better covered within broader fintech topics instead of maintaining a dedicated article. Xrimonciam (talk) 08:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Xrimonciam (talk) 08:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Engineering, Football, Software, and Nigeria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:08, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sporting Lagos F.C. as possible search term, does not look to be independently notable. Giant Snowman 19:11, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose deletion and redirect proposer User:Xrimonciam makes the argument that this individual would be better covered in other topics, however they've also submitted this individual's company Paystack for deletion as well-- it seems a curious motivation to delete both of these when they both can be considered notable. This entrepreneur is certainly notable for the region and deleting would contribute to systematic bias on the site. Not only did Akinade get into Y Combinator, one of the first African startups to do so, their exit to Stripe is one of the biggest success stories for African fintech of recent history. The fact that he's now involved in owning a private football club is significantly notable beyond his business interests. More than fulfills the notability requirements Nayyn (talk) 14:08, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GrabUp - Talk 08:43, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjeev Kumar Bijli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies. The article lacks significant independent coverage from reliable sources that establish notability beyond his corporate role. Most references focus on his position at PVR Cinemas rather than demonstrating substantial independent recognition Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 08:04, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 08:04, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Film, Delhi, England, and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Sources cited in the article like [23], [24], and [25] are bylined, independent, and provide sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. Bakhtar40 (talk) 11:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
None of the sources provided by you is reliable. I read them all. They all are talking about either the other brother or business or are just collection of citations (thus not meeting Reliable sources standards):

Sanjeev smiles, and nods his head.

"No, actually both of us are innovators and look at improvisation in equal measures. But Ajay is slightly more of the innovator than I am. Innovation in the film industry is absolutely mandatory as it had been stagnant for the longest time."

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/the-bro-code-of-bijli-brothers-divide-the-work-multiply-the-fun/articleshow/51680481.cms?

[26]

Adds Sanjeev: “For now, focusing on maintaining the numbers and the profitability in Cinemax-and analyzing the numbers there-are top priorities. We are also talking to the team and meeting and motivating them, assuring them things are the way they were. We are also learning from each other. Cinemax is a very well-run company with high profitability, processes and systems. We are trying to apply best practices of both to the common entity. We are also looking at enhancing the numbers of the common entity.” 31.165.10.116 (talk) 13:44, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
no sufficient coverage, not independence in coverage to meet GNG. 31.165.10.116 (talk) 13:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sources are not deep and reliable. Interviews or brief press release mentions. --31.165.10.116 (talk) 13:44, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Galatta Ganapathy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:Notability (films). See that Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force#Generally used sources lists Filmibeat as unreliable. There are no reliable reviews [27], [28], and [29]. DareshMohan (talk) 07:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who added Filmibeat to the category/red "plainly unreliable" but the decision seems based on (at least refers to) 2 discussions. Let's have a look: two short threads; one is about BLP that only concludes "For now, I would suggest not using it in BLPs on the basis of "least harm" in 2015, while in the other (same year) THREE users find it.... RELIABLE!!! and NONE, NON-RELIABLE. So maybe it's not great journalism (certainly the article is not great) but the consensus about not using it for verification of uncontroversial facts is not clear (more recent opinions expressed (2022/2023) on the noticeboard about the site are based on its presence in red at ICTF...).So if the consensus exists, it should not be based on the 2 threads it quotes. -Mushy Yank. 23:46, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 March 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Tamil films of 2003: standard WP:ATD for released films with notable cast; not opposed to Keep, as this is 2003 and print sources might exist and show this meets WP:NFIC in some way. Opposed to deletion. -Mushy Yank. 10:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List_of_Tamil_films_of_2003#July—September or Delete. 2 sources on the page, one is unreliable WP:ICTFSOURCES and the other just lists the song track from the movie. Nothing notable and no significant coverage. RangersRus (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm a bit uncomfortable redirecting non-notable films to a main list page. I feel like this runs the risk of turning list pages into entries that violate WP:INDISCRIMINATE and turn them into a database collecting any and every film that could potentially fall under that criteria. This not only makes the page unwieldy, but it would make it difficult to really determine which films are notable. It also kind of encourages people to come on and create pages for their non-notable movies because they're getting "rewarded" with a mention of their film somewhere. Sometimes we do have cases where a film warrants mention somewhere, but doesn't pass NFILM, but those are pretty rare and are cases where something falls just shy of NFILM. Those are typically things like an early or extremely rare example of a film, or one where it's frequently mentioned in RS but never in enough depth to pass NFILM. It's extremely rare that this comes along. This film? Tamil language movies are released all the time, sometimes with notable people, sometimes not. The film existing doesn't necessarily mean that it is notable and needs mention on Wikipedia somewhere.

I'm going to bring this up at the film WikiProject. I get wanting to include everything, but this just feels too inclusionary for my tastes. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 21:27, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just have a look at the cast, please. -Mushy Yank. 22:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Labov marketing communications and training

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability (NCORP), mainly unsourced page with promotional content. Cinder painter (talk) 08:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Companies, and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Very little content is referenced, and of the three references, one is directly tied to the subject and other is a local chamber of commerce (whose main task is to promote local businesses). So there's one article that's independent and reliable, which maybe (or maybe not) establishes notability. I've tagged the article as needing more references, but I don't think the company meets notability criteria. Ira Leviton (talk) 14:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: WP:NOTPROMO - This looks to be an unfinished recruitment advertisement. Of the three sources, one is a book written by this company's founder. The key people are all red links. — Maile (talk) 20:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Gokey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies. The article lacks significant independent coverage from reliable sources that establish notability beyond his corporate role. Most references focus on his position at Broadridge Financial Solutions rather than demonstrating substantial independent recognition. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 07:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 07:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Finance, Technology, England, United States of America, and New Jersey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

With respect, this CEO of an S&P 500 company cearly crosses the WP:GNG threshold. There is plenty of "independent coverage" to note, as you can see here, here, here, here, here, and here (to share just a few examples), ranging from his career to board memberships, time at Oxford University, support for women's rowing, and more. Just because news coverage often focuses on his leadership at Broadridge Financial Solutions doesn't make him any less notable; to the contrary, Broadridge is one of the largest companies in the world, making what Gokey does there even more important in the grand scheme of things. Chief Executive is a big deal, and they clearly profiled him for a reason, going into detail about non-Broadridge-related stuff like captaining New College Oxford’s crew team apparently. This article got into rowing and his Rhodes scholarship too, among others. Doctorstrange617 (talk) 14:33, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan McInerney

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies. The article lacks significant independent coverage from reliable sources to establish notability beyond routine coverage of his professional role. Most sources primarily focus on Visa Inc., rather than McInerney as a notable individual. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 07:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 07:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Finance, United States of America, and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Péter Haraszti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notable, verifiable sources proving his subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. A lot of media references are personally relevant. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 07:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bibliographies-related deletion discussions. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 07:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Hungary. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gridbeyond

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite the attempt to make it seem otherwise, there is no useful coverage of the article subject I could find, and citing 4 copies of every press release (or churnalism of the same) about a funding round or a new contract signed does not make for an encyclopedic article. Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Environment, Technology, and Ireland. Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CJ Darcl Logistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lacks sufficient coverage from independent, reliable sources, failing to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. If the article primarily relies on self-published sources or promotional content, it would violate Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability standards. Welcome to Pandora (talk) 14:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Welcome to Pandora (talk) 14:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Haryana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:10, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Pandora! I have made changes in the article. Adityasharma0701 (talk) 10:33, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:37, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

British Columbia Excalibur Party

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. I found no in-depth coverage in reliable sources after searching through Google and provincial archives (Vancouver City archives + UBC Library). The now defunct party achieved insignificant results in the one election it contested (less than one-tenth of a percent in 2013), so there is no obvious claim of notability.

Of the 6 sources cited, 2 are primary sources, 2 are blogs, 1 is routine local coverage for the election cycle, and 1 is a routine registration list from Elections BC. I found one more article from a minor news publisher that accepts articles from the general public. A lack of reliable and in-depth coverage indicates a lack of lasting significance as well. Yue🌙 05:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Canada. Yue🌙 05:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pitch Yarn of Matter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been around for nearly 20 years yet has not indicated how the subject is notable per WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG. Google search for "Pitch Yarn of Matter" comes up with a lot of directories, social media, and sites that have copied from Wikipedia, but not significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. ... discospinster _talk 03:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Brazil. ... discospinster _talk 03:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – I did a WP:BEFORE, and there is zero WP:SIGCOV. Article created in the early days of the project, in disagreement with the current guidelines. Svartner (talk) 17:32, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trina Firmalo-Fabic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mayor of a small town in an island province. Fails WP:NPOL. Sourcing only covers her COVID-19 pandemic feat and a profile from the Obama Foundation. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 03:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Philippines. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 03:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Beings just a mayor doesn’t cut the edge for NPOL#1 and the sources I see doesn’t meet NPOL#2. If there are sources that I missed, I’ll appreciate a ping to re-evaluate my !vote. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:47, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NPOL --Lenticel ^(talk) 07:30, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, while fails WP:NPOL, it could had been saved if it passes WP:GNG, but the 2 WP:RS are not extensive enough. Howard the Duck (talk) 10:10, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of breweries in San Diego County, California

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOT. This is as close it as it can get to a directory/Yellow Page and I question the encyclopedic value. Graywalls (talk) 02:48, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, Lists, and California. Graywalls (talk) 02:48, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of breweries in California. DotesConks (talk) 00:21, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, but remove all of the breweries without Wikipedia articles. Keeping this list up-to-date is unrealistic -- the only reason to keep it is to serve as a navigational aid for the several Wikipedia articles on breweries in the county, but that is a good reason to do so. The yellow-pages problem can be fixed by deleting everything without a Wikipedia article -- anything that gets an article can be re-added. Mrfoogles (talk) 02:56, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of breweries in California. Agree with @Mrfoogles that we should not be listing non-notable locations – microbreweries are common and usually unremarkable local businesses like other stores and restaurants and don't need to be listed, but this doesn't warrant a separate county list. The statewide list should also be trimmed to the notable ones though. Reywas92^Talk 03:30, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Going to note merging appears to have been already discussed on the talk page of this list, so there might be some useful info there. Mrfoogles (talk) 04:18, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:21, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of breweries in California. Keep only notable entries (with articles) and cleanse the rest. Ajf773 (talk) 09:14, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I concur with Mrfoogles: Keep, but remove all of the breweries without Wikipedia articles. This will remove about half of the listings and leave only the ones that are notable enough to have their own article. There are enough notable breweries in the county to justify an article listing them. -- MelanieN (talk) 09:48 19 March 2025 (UTC)
There is also Beer in San Diego County, California#Notable breweries as a merge target. There are fewer than 20 notable breweries and we certainly don't need a standalone page for just a bulleted list when there's this article and the statewide list. Reywas92^Talk 14:02, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If not keep, where should this be targeted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Marv (Sin City)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor comic book character. While there is a reception, it is just a summary of several listicles, in which the character takes at best a 24th place. Other than that, this is just a plot summary and a list of appearances in various media. This fails WP:GNG and at best could be redirected to the List of Sin City characters _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:54, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:54, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Sin City characters: the info currently in reception can be merged to the list, condensed to about a sentence, probably, and the rest of the article is just plot summary. Did a quick google and didn't find anything obvious -- it seems unlikely by assumption he needs his own article separate from Sin City. I don't know of a lot of reviews that only talk about one character except for the most famous works. Mrfoogles (talk) 02:44, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. He is not a "minor comic book character"!!!!! I've expanded the reception. Please take less Sin City-related articles to AfD or do thorough BEFORES, Piotrus. Marv clearly meets WP:GNG. Thank you.-Mushy Yank. 19:40, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:11, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This article has significantly changed since its AfD nomination. -Mushy Yank. 10:56, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Sin City characters - Mushy Yank has done good work, but in my opinion all of these are passing mentions of Marv, except for maybe the Dan Rempala book, so it still doesn't meet GNG. CohenTheBohemian (talk) 14:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Tons of other sources exist; might add more if I have time. (and thank you but I beg to differ, most of the sources I added are not only "passing mentions"). -Mushy Yank. 16:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Added a couple of things again. No time to do more but sources exist (a lot). -Mushy Yank. 17:01, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos Felipe de Habsburgo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:MILL WP:NOTGENEALOGY - reads mostly like a genealogical entry, half of the article is about family tree and their place in it, the rest is places they worked and where they got an education. D1551D3N7 (talk) 01:51, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Mexico. D1551D3N7 (talk) 01:51, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:10, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete Did a source review -- none of them currently have a significant description of him. He gets mentioned in the margins as his father, etc. is discussed, mostly, and there are a bunch of non-independent sources about him at conferences. One article talks about his children, interestingly enough, but not really him.

Googling, I immediately find sources mentioning him -- e.g.

Overall they seem to all focus on events he attends & one or two interviews, but not really about him. There's also this book in Spanish whose relevance I'm unsure of.

However, I feel like a more thorough Spanish source search might turn up some things. Mrfoogles (talk) 02:55, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: On ProQuest, the most representative database for Spanish-language media in the Wikipedia Library, he receives a meager 13 hits, all of which are again trivial mentions about events he attended and his relation to the line. Moreover, the only scholarly coverage is a minor inclusion in a 2024 thesis. Although there are many mentions in reliable sources, they do not amount to WP:SIGCOV and thereby fail WP:GNG. XxTechnicianxX (talk) 13:45, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I'm going to acknowledge the fact the article itself is lacking in notability; but it still has value and potential. Leaving aside the fact he's a descendant of Karl I of Austria - he's been involved in press conferences regarding the history of his family, and has been directly mentioned in a government website (gov.mx) for his involvement with the Morelia Music Festival, which underscores his engagement in public and cultural affairs. Therefore, I vote to keep the article with the intent to enhance it further. JayzBox (talk) 00:58, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your intent, but to do so you'd need to find reliable sources that say more than the current ones do, and as of yet no one has been able to do that. I would support moving it to draftspace if you want to work on it but not now, though. Mrfoogles (talk) 07:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:11, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Juniper Heights, Arizona

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We missed this one in earlier passes through Arizona "communities"; it's a 1960s-era NN subdivision that once was isolated in the hills south of Prescott, but sprawl has since reached it. Mangoe (talk) 02:41, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unsurprisingly, the history books have nothing; and the toponymy books are talking about a mesa not a housing corporation (which I am presuming is what "HC" stands for in some old mailing addresses). There's nothing to be had on this. Uncle G (talk) 04:10, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. G11: Totally promotional. JBW (talk) 00:21, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is a copy of Occupational therapy#Global occupational therapy. If you intend to break it out into its own article, then please remove the section from that article. (The text will need more wikilinks, and will also need adjustment to its tone to sound more encyclopedic.) Brian Kendig (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Brian Kendig (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:31, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- This isn't an argument for deletion, and you shouldn't use AFD as a way to underline a point to other editors. If you think this article is fine you can remove the section yourself; if you think it's not fine you can tag it with {{tone}}. Before nominating an article for AFD you are required to search for reliable sources in good faith. There aren't any right now, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.

For example, what about this work, which appears independent and is a huge source. More sources are this book, this book, and this book. Mrfoogles (talk) 07:10, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is blatant spam and should have been speedied as G11, theoretical notability aside. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Waheed Zafar Qasmi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. References are YouTube, Wordpress, and other unreliable sources. Those I can find that are reliable are mainly mentions. CNMall41 (talk) 01:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Islam, and Pakistan. CNMall41 (talk) 01:25, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Poetry, Radio, and Television. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:32, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I see no coverage about this individual in my search, what's now in the article is primary or non-RS. I don't see notability for this person. Oaktree b (talk) 14:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 02:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Citizens Action Party (British Columbia)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. My search through Google resources (e.g. Google Books, Google Scholar) and provincial archives (accessed through Vancouver City archives and UBC archives) yielded no in-depth coverage by reliable sources. The party existed in between elections and did not contest any elections before dissolving. There is therefore no obvious claim of notability. Yue🌙 00:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Canada. Yue🌙 00:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There is absolutely no sourcing whatsoever on this. The article also says "The Citizens Action Party was de-registered by Elections BC in June 2009." — Maile (talk) 01:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Emerged Democracy Party of British Columbia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. My search through Google resources (e.g. Google Books, Google Scholar) and provincial archives (accessed through Vancouver City archives and UBC archives) yielded no in-depth coverage by reliable sources. The party achieved insignificant results (less than one-hundredth of a percent) in the one election it contested, so there is no obvious claim of notability. Yue🌙 00:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Canada. Yue🌙 00:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

British Columbia Youth Coalition

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. My search through Google resources (e.g. Google Books, Google Scholar) and provincial archives (accessed through Vancouver City archives and UBC archives) yielded no in-depth coverage by reliable sources. The party's electoral results in 2005 were insignificant as well, so there is no obvious claim of notability. Yue🌙 00:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Canada. Yue🌙 00:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article lacks significant independent coverage from reliable, third-party sources, and the coalition appears to have limited impact or recognition beyond its own self-promotion or its immediate activities. --Xrimonciam (talk) 10:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Link BC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. My search through Google resources (e.g. Google Books, Google Scholar) and provincial archives (accessed through Vancouver City archives and UBC archives) yielded no in-depth coverage by reliable sources. The party existed in between elections and did not contest any elections before dissolving. There is therefore no obvious claim of notability. Yue🌙 00:29, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Canada. Yue🌙 00:29, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - For reasons above and the fact that it cites no sources (which would fail being talked about in WP:NOTABILITY). DotesConks (talk) 04:17, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Petr Píšek

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable nobleman with a biography that hundreds of Czech medieval lower nobles had. The sources used are only trivial mentions. FromCzech (talk) 07:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Czech Republic. FromCzech (talk) 07:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I wrote this article as I believe the subject is a politically notable figure from an important family. The subject held royal appointments and was the ruler of several notable castles/villages. The sources I've found are brief, yes, but are clear that this subject was notable during a politically and militarily unstable time in the Kingdom of Bohemia. The subject is 600 years old, and I presume there are many sources that are not digitized or I have missed on my search. I also do not want to discount the modern depiction of the subject (even a characterization) in the recent video game referenced in the article. While not proof of notability on its own, I do believe it supports the above assertions. Mbdfar (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 10:16, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

According to the content of the article, he was the equivalent of a local politician, and ruled only the villages of Perštejnec, Vysoká and co-ruled Suchdol. His family was only a wealthy bourgeois family, not a noble family. There is no article for him or his family on cswiki, which would be very unlikely if him or his family was important like you say. You need WP:SIGCOV to demonstrate his notability. With all due respect, it seems that the main motivation for the creation of the page is the appearance of the character in the video game based on him, not the merits of the real character. FromCzech (talk) 11:12, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
He ruled "only" three towns/castles. Respectfully, the cswiki has 7% of the articles that the enwiki does and is not a qualifier of subject notability. I learned about this historical figure through his portrayal in recent media, correct. My motivation for creating this page was improving Wikipedia's coverage of notable subjects found in this time and place. Mbdfar (talk) 11:30, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I should not have written that last sentence. Cswiki is of course not qualifier of subject notability, I wrote this just for comparison. The existence of SIGCOV is decisive. FromCzech (talk) 11:38, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, to share a comment by Bigvadrouille549, where a source was provided "from the historian Emmnuel Leminger on the Italian Court. You can see that Peter of Pisek was mintmaster between 1391-99 [30]". The referenced text seems to be on page 169.

Another trivial mention in the list of burghers who held this clerk position. FromCzech (talk) 13:40, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quite more than a list of names as you insinuate. Perhaps the position is important enough to have such biographical records collated and published 500 years later. Mbdfar (talk) 13:51, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be a quite prestigious position if I am correct in equating it to Nejvyšší mincmistr [cs], an article which does mention the subject. Mbdfar (talk) 16:36, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:18, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep The article is well sourced, it probably just needs a rewrite

Alexthegod5 (talk) 22:48, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 00:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete. Article was probably only created due to the Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 reference mentioned at the end. Cottagechez (talk) 01:49, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- this article is fairly thorough and well cited. The purpose of the notability policy is to make sure decent articles can be written -- this one is fairly decent and talks about him. Mrfoogles (talk) 07:13, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just because the sources are brief doesn't mean they're completely trivial -- the current article describes him as reputed to be kind in church donations, built a church, defended a castle -- there is, I think, enough stuff there to prove that an article can be written and has. Mrfoogles (talk) 07:16, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Clayton Cramer | CWI Directory". College of Western Idaho. 2012-03-01. Retrieved 2025-03-18.

[HNN2-2] "What Clayton Cramer Saw and (Nearly) Everyone Else Missed". History News Network, George Mason University. January 6, 2003. Retrieved 26 February 2009.

[3] Cramer, Clayton (March 2012). "Madness, Deinstitutionalization & Murder" (PDF). Engage. 13 (1). Federalist Society: 37–43. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 23, 2020. Retrieved May 22, 2012.

[4] My Brother Ron: A Personal and Social History of the Deinstitutionalization of the Mentally Ill. Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. 2012. ISBN 978-1477667538.

[5] "Oct. 25: Michael Bellesiles Resigns from Emory Faculty". Emory University. October 25, 2002. Retrieved 26 February 2009.

[6] "The Bancroft and Bellesiles". History News Network, George Mason University. December 13, 2002. Retrieved February 26, 2009.

[7] "2008 Primary Election Results Legislative Totals". Archived from the original on May 1, 2012. Retrieved May 17, 2009.

[:2-8] Lindgren, James; Bellesiles, Michael A. (2002). "Fall from Grace: Arming America and the Bellesiles Scandal". Yale Law Journal. 111 (8). The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc.: 2195. doi:10.2307/797645. JSTOR 797645. SSRN 692421.

[9] Wilson, J (Jan 2002). "The Scandal of Arming America. (Stranger in a Strange Land)". Books & Culture. 8 (1): 4–6.

[10] Hoffer, Peter Charles (2007). Past imperfect: facts, fictions, fraud, American history from Bancroft and Parkman to Ambrose, Bellesiles, Ellis and Goodwin. History. New York: PublicAffairs. ISBN 978-1-58648-445-3.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]